On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2015, at 10:24 AM, paul <pault.eg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If fossil mv also moves files on a filesystem, I'd be happy with that, > so long > > as I can still use a file browser as I'm doing now. > > All other VCSes I’ve used that do one-step mv [*] cope with this case > transparently. They see that the on-disk file is already moved, so they > just take your command as a request to reflect the change in the repo, too. > I suppose the VCS could match the hashes of the "missing" files to the hashes of the "new" files to detect any moved/renamed files. However, that fails if the moved files were also edited, so there would still have to a way to explicitly tell the VCS about moved/renamed files.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
