Let's forget the GIT staging area, I believe most of us, fossil users, have proven that is not needed at all. Years and years committing without staging, that proves is not needed ;) On Mar 20, 2015 10:51 AM, "Kevin Greiner" <grein...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Abilio Marques <abili...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> I personally would like a selective stash. > > > Yes, I would find selective stash save/apply useful. > > But I see the dangers of partial commit of git's staging area. I admit, > I've abused that myself to commit a comment or documentation typo without > compiling or testing. > > >> Perhaps one where you can >> selectively push some changes (then fossil could proceed to remove them >> from the actual files), or selectively pop/apply some changes (but I >> imagine this one could get things confusing, specially if used with >> apply). > > > I've read that git has an interactive mode [1] that allows the user to > stage specific parts or changes within a single file. However, I've only > used Atlassian's SourceTree tool to interact with git's staging area. The > GUI makes it simple to select chunks to include or exclude. > > 1 - > http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Interactive-Staging#Staging-Patches > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > >
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
