On 6/17/15, Jan Danielsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/06/15 11:38, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > [---] >> Sadly, a plain pull is not 100% read-only, so WAL doesn't help avoiding >> such problems. > > Out of curiosity; why aren't pulls 100% read-only on the server? >
The server might decide to create a new cluster artifact (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki#cluster) to help it with the sync. There may be other reasons, but that is the first one that springs to mind. -- D. Richard Hipp [email protected] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
