On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 12:10:36PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 6/17/15, Jan Danielsson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 17/06/15 11:38, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > [---] > >> Sadly, a plain pull is not 100% read-only, so WAL doesn't help avoiding > >> such problems. > > > > Out of curiosity; why aren't pulls 100% read-only on the server? > > > > The server might decide to create a new cluster artifact > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/fileformat.wiki#cluster) > to help it with the sync.
But it should not have to do that on a pull. Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
