On 9/11/2015 2:10 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On Sep 11, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Ross Berteig <r...@cheshireeng.com>
wrote:
I guess the other question to ask is how many of us have a project
with a branch named "undo”?
Branches don’t enter into it. The proposal was for “diff --undo”,
not “diff undo”.
An early suggestion from either Stephen or D.R. Hipp was to name the
feature either "diff --from-undo" or "diff --from undo" as clearer than
"diff --undo". Allowing "--from undo" implies treating "undo" in that
context (and perhaps other commands too) as a special name, which would
have the small downside of making access to a branch (or just a tagged
checkin) named "undo" harder.
I personally think that "diff --from undo" is the best of all the
proposals floated in this thread, and tend to assume that "undo" is an
unlikely branch or tag name.
--
Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com
Cheshire Engineering Corp. http://www.CheshireEng.com/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
