On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:45:28 +0200, Johan Kuuse <jo...@kuu.se> wrote:
fossil diff -before
or
fossil diff -before-commit
typo... I just wanted to propose another name for the requested option,
and actually I meant "call it `diff --before' or `diff --before-update'
which I for one would be able to memorize as "compute diff of current
state vs. state before the preceding update". actually, considering the
original posters `subject' line, one might also look at it the other way
round and call it `diff --after-update' ;-)
personally, I find reference to the undo buffer a long way from being
obvious to someone just using fossil as DVCS (rather than someone
interested in in the details/internals of `fossil').
?
El 12/9/2015 1:14, "Andy Bradford" <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> escribió:
Thus said Richard Hipp on Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:11:30 -0400:
> "fossil diff --versus-undo" maybe???
What if instead of making this a feature of ``fossil diff'' it became a
feature of ``fossil undo?''
fossil undo --diff
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 4000000055f36093
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
