On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:54:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 12/2/15, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > thank you. sorry if this has been discussed/explained before: this means, > > there still is demand for that option? why? is there still a bug out > > there? because if not, it seems whatever `--verily' is doing here should > > be done all the time in order to avoid incomplete syncs in the first place? > > > > There are no known bugs. --verily is a defensive measure in case some > currently unknown bugs appear in the future.
The problem for the NetBSD repo was if the local repository on a pull has a large list of phantoms and the server would decline all of them as unknown, the client wouldn't continue with the next set of phantoms, but just give up. Joerg _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
