HI,
2016-08-13 19:45 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp <[email protected]>:
> But you still have not made your case for why growth of the stash id
> is a bad thing.
I know, it would be purely cosmetic.
What is largest possible stash id on 32 bit systems?
My stash ID's after testing are now
$ fos pool
6: [7ad8230273fa79] on 2016-02-15 23:04:46
(comments removed)
8: [7ad8230273fa79] on 2016-02-15 23:17:34
10: [7ad8230273fa79] on 2016-02-16 03:32:31
11: [8ed01e8021d415] on 2016-02-26 04:09:25
12: [b06cd631f18043] on 2016-03-07 23:06:20
13: [57f1eaecb80dcf] on 2016-03-27 23:28:45
and next would being 23 (in the pristine version).
Maybe I use this function even incorrect and should discard the slots faster.
They contains/keeps small changes here and there...
Whatever:
It's not my intention to belittle your work. I try my best from a
luser's perspective.
Thanks for your time and work,
Kain
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
