I's about 1/3 of the way through this report: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.version-control/nh4fITFlEMk
It seems that they originally preferred GIT (because it was what they knew) but now prefer hg, although it's a bit light on the reasons. The article points out that Facebook has a heavily mod-ed version of hg. It might be interesting to see what they've done that has made their people happy... for consideration for fossil. There's also a new command called absorb that does some merging before commits that seems quite useful. Also of interest is that Facebook is doing an implementation of hg in Rust. Fossil seems pretty robust in C, but Rust would increase safety confidence. ../Dave
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
