On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:33 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 10/27/16, David Mason <dma...@ryerson.ca> wrote: >> >> However, the value of Rust is not simply memory management. The >> *considerably* more expressive type system, and the much more robust type >> checking can reduce LOC while improving both readability and safety. > > Perhaps true. But in my brief look at Rust I observed that you really > cannot use it effectively without also having to use Git. The two > seem closely linked. Is that incorrect?
Rust is under heavy development and more importantly is quite new kid on the block so OS distros usually have not picked it yet. i.e. no packages in Ubuntu nor Debian but for example in OpenBSD you may be lucky with "pkg_add rust" already. So please be patient and give it/them a time. Honestly I think rust is quite nice and I'm glad that such thing happen well yet I find Haskell even nicer. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
