|
On 27/02/2017 16:14, Richard Hipp
wrote:
I wish I could, but I'm so over-committed right now I can't. Once my work-load subsides a bit I'll be happy to do that.On 2/26/17, Ron Aaron <[email protected]> wrote:>From a performance standpoint, I would rather see Fossil adopt the BLAKE2 hash, as it is one of the fastest of the SHA3 finalists, and has adjustable output hash size.Please write and check-in code (on the "fossil-2.0" branch) that implements BLAKE2 in a manner analogous to the code in sha1.c and sha3.c. I suggest a new file named "blake2.c". I will then make it an option. What hash length do you want for BLAKE2? Please make the hash length for Fossil-BLAKE2 be a multiple of 8 bits and different from 160, 228, and 256 as those values are already assigned to other hashes. |
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
