On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:58 PM, <fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote:
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:35:13 -0400 > From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Perception of Fossil > > An alternative design sketch: > > (4) The pullrequest command creates a "bundle" out of the "anon-patch" > branch and then transmits that bundle back to the server from which > the clone originated. > > (5) The server accepts the bundle and parks it in a separate holding > table, but does not merge it or otherwise make it available to average > passers by. The server then sends email notifications to developers > with appropriate privileges to let them know that a pull request has > arrived. > How does the bundle get transmitted to the server? If via a push, making the bundle seems like extra work.. Would it make sense to enhance Fossil to (optionally) accept only non-truck branches - and so in a way that makes them purge-able like the branch created from an imported bundle is purge-able?
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
