On 8 Jan 2009, at 22:16, Thomas Dalton wrote: > > I don't think that's clear at all. I don't know how many authors you > are meant to attribute things to under CC-BY-SA, it may well be all of > them. I need to do more research (or, I need someone to tell me the > answer!).
My preference would be: all authors that have contributed to the article, where that contribution has not been reverted, unless the authors say that they don't want to be attributed. There is a large amount of leeway here, though: I think even "Wikipedia" would satisfy the license, or on the other scale a complete list of every editor of the wiki. The WMF really needs to state up front what the attribution should be before we have the vote / start using the license (assuming we do). Note that for the GFDL the requirement is that five (or all if less than 5) of the principle authors of the document (which I would interpret as an article) should be attributed. Personally, for everything I've written, and any photograph I've taken, I want to be attributed when it is / they are used, with the option to waive the attribution if I dislike the usage of it. That applies both to content I've submitted to Wikipedia et al., and in general to anything else I do. I'm happy for that attribution to be relegated to an "et al." in the case of being one author among many, where my contributions are less than the N authors being attributed. Mike Peel _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
