On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Erik Moeller <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/1/8 Robert Rohde <[email protected]>: > > I'm looking for guidance of the sort: Doing X, Y, and Z, is generally > > sufficient to comply with CC-BY-SA. It need not be minimally > > sufficient, and probably shouldn't be, since any advice we give ought > > to be at a level that is clearly black and white, and not gray. Maybe > > we necessarily limit that advice to text and certain traditional print > > mediums, but I do think there needs to be something direct about > > acceptable standards for attribution. > > I agree. We'll try to formulate that attribution guideline as part of > the full proposal (and it'll be discussed further from there before we > go into voting). As I mentioned earlier up-thread, it'll likely look > similar to what is suggested here: > > http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/GFDL_suggestions#Proposed_attribution_text > Erik, who, in your view, is/are "the Original Author"? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
