2009/1/8 Michael Peel <em...@mikepeel.net>: > > On 8 Jan 2009, at 22:16, Thomas Dalton wrote: >> >> I don't think that's clear at all. I don't know how many authors you >> are meant to attribute things to under CC-BY-SA, it may well be all of >> them. I need to do more research (or, I need someone to tell me the >> answer!). > > My preference would be: all authors that have contributed to the > article, where that contribution has not been reverted, unless the > authors say that they don't want to be attributed.
I would agree, except that I would exclude non-creative contributions (spelling corrections, say). It would probably be easier for a re-user to include them anyway, though. >There is a large > amount of leeway here, though: I think even "Wikipedia" would satisfy > the license, or on the other scale a complete list of every editor of > the wiki. The WMF really needs to state up front what the attribution > should be before we have the vote / start using the license (assuming > we do). "Wikipedia" would only satisfy the license if the author specifically said that was ok. The FAQ says there will not be a requirement to designate "Wikipedia" or anything else to receive the attribution. I would expect the attribution requirements to be made perfectly clear before we vote, if they're not, I would almost certainly vote against the proposal. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l