Erik Moeller wrote: > > For example, if WMF decides that a guaranteed by-name attribution is > not reasonable, scalable, and detrimental to the goals of WMF, it can > responsibly tell people that. People who have made past edits could be > given the option to have _those_ edits always attributed by name. The > community could gradually factor out those edits if it considers them > to be cumbersome. > >
Let me just humbly ask you. Would it be detrimental to the goals of the WMF, if people re-using WMF content could do so in a way that would make the content impossible to use in any jurisdiction where moral rights obtain? I ask only in a search for clarity on this issue. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
