Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/2/20 Henning Schlottmann <[email protected]>: > >> * Ditch the dual licensing. I don't understand it. I am trained as a >> lawyer to understand about licenses and I have not the slightest idea >> how the dual licensing is supposed to work. No one I talked to - >> layperson or professional - understood about it. Make a hard switch, as >> GFDL 1.3 allows. If RMS doesn't like it, too bad. >> > > As I understand it, the WMF made an agreement with RMS that the > projects would be dual licensed and not switched entirely. I think > making that agreement was a mistake, but there's not much that can be > done about it now. The WMF shouldn't go back on its word. > > _
I would be interested to hear what your source was for such a deal between RMS and the WMF. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
