On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote:
> I don't know if it's written down or not, but that email makes it > fairly public. From what I can tell, it was just a compromise made > during the negotiations. I guess, although if it is written I'd be interested in exactly what was promised. > The reasons are fairly obvious - the FSF > wants people to still be using their license and the WMF felt the need > to compromise, so agreed to it. If the FSF wants people to still be using their license [for Wikipedia], why would the FSF compromise? Do you think the FSF is allowing Wikipedia to switch to CC-BY-SA even though they think the GFDL is a better license, for Wikipedia? There's gotta be more to it than that. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
