On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Thomas Dalton <[email protected]>wrote:
> 2009/2/22 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <[email protected]>: > > Thomas Dalton wrote: > >> As I understand it, the WMF made an agreement with RMS that the > >> projects would be dual licensed and not switched entirely. I think > >> making that agreement was a mistake, but there's not much that can be > >> done about it now. The WMF shouldn't go back on its word. > > > > I would be interested to hear what your source was for such > > a deal between RMS and the WMF. > > http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2008-November/047013.html > Is this a written agreement? Why isn't it public? Why haven't the reasons for the agreement been made public? _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
