I'm going off of statements like this: " I happen to be the one who have created the Hungarian checkuser policy, which is, as far as I know, the strictest one in WMF projects, and it's no joke, and I intend to follow it."
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Bence Damokos <[email protected]> wrote: > This might be going off topic, and not really helpful in finding a solution > (along the lines of wamping up WMF stats capabilities in the near future or > reinstating the huwiki solution in a way accpetable to the WMF and the > hu.wp > community and possibly benefitting other communities, as well): > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Just to be clear, it has been claimed in this thread that the CheckUser > > right also gives those admins the right to collect additional data on > users > > and analyze it. I've just read the privacy policy and that is not true. > > > > I believe there was no such claim, if anything, it was pointed out that > setting up the stats engine didn't give access to information that was not > accessible before by the Checkusers (even if logged), and that most fears > of > data being handled by the wrong hands are mitigated by the facts that the > data was handled by a CheckUser (and thus a) a person already with access > to > said data and b) a person identified to the WMF and trusted by the > community*). > > (*Not that I would want to introduce community trust into the argument, > just > pointing out the inherent properties of being a CU.) > > Best regards, > Bence Damokos > _______________________________________________ > foundation-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l > _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
