<quote who="Luis Villa"> > I have no particular horse here, but I will note that if we want to use > wiki for serious documents, we must have high quality RCS, and mediawiki > and whatever ubuntu use have that, and live.gnome.org does not, which is a > serious bummer.
We do our serious document authoring in CVS, and while I can see a use case for it in the wiki, we have long had a convention (almost policy) of keeping important stuff like that in CVS. Meanwhile: http://live.gnome.org/FrontPage?action=info > Also, Jeff, AFAICT, mediawiki (being the engine behind the biggest wiki in > the world) seems to have a decent rep; dismissing it as 'fruit loops' is > silly. Froot Loops for GNOME's requirements, which is the context in which it was said. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australia http://linux.conf.au/ "Blessed are the cracked, for they let in the light." - Spike Milligan _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
