If the thread must be continued, please don't cc ad-board. I've dropped them from this reply.
On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 17:13:03 -0600, Shaun McCance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:07 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > > I have no particular horse here, but I will note that if we want to > > use wiki for serious documents, we must have high quality RCS, and > > mediawiki and whatever ubuntu use have that, and live.gnome.org does > > not, which is a serious bummer. > > > > Also, Jeff, AFAICT, mediawiki (being the engine behind the biggest > > wiki in the world) seems to have a decent rep; dismissing it as 'fruit > > loops' is silly. > > I have to second this. MediaWiki also has a much more sane syntax. > For something that's supposed to make my life easier, I've had to > spend quite a lot of time trying to figure out which combinations > of characters are syntactically valid. It reminds me of Perl, and > that isn't a compliment. > > -- > Shaun > > _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
