On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 17:07 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > I have no particular horse here, but I will note that if we want to > use wiki for serious documents, we must have high quality RCS, and > mediawiki and whatever ubuntu use have that, and live.gnome.org does > not, which is a serious bummer. > > Also, Jeff, AFAICT, mediawiki (being the engine behind the biggest > wiki in the world) seems to have a decent rep; dismissing it as 'fruit > loops' is silly.
I have to second this. MediaWiki also has a much more sane syntax. For something that's supposed to make my life easier, I've had to spend quite a lot of time trying to figure out which combinations of characters are syntactically valid. It reminds me of Perl, and that isn't a compliment. -- Shaun _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
