On Nov 29, 2007 8:31 AM, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007 1:33 PM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 29, 2007 5:59 AM, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > <quote who="Rui Miguel Silva Seabra"> > > > > > > > I think you're way too harsh on people who actually concluded things > > > > like: > > > > > > Sorry, but the negativity of that site greatly outweighs the positive. It > > > takes more than a little sucking up to earn back my respect after the crap > > > they've been spewing. > > > > I'll second this. The fact:fiction ratio of boycottnovell is just > > incredibly, incredibly bad. > > RMS message read "If part of it is not accurate, I hope someone will > explain." Do you care to sort out what is fact and what is fiction?
Jeff has ably debunked this particular fiction already in the thread, and more generally ably debunked the FUD that Novell somehow controls the Foundation. As to the rest, I have better things to do with my life than to debunk the rest of boycottnovell post-by-post. Luis _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
