On Nov 29, 2007 12:44 PM, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 29, 2007 3:13 PM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 29, 2007 8:31 AM, BJörn Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On Nov 29, 2007 1:33 PM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'll second this. The fact:fiction ratio of boycottnovell is just > > > > incredibly, incredibly bad. > > > > > > RMS message read "If part of it is not accurate, I hope someone will > > > explain." Do you care to sort out what is fact and what is fiction? > > > > Jeff has ably debunked this particular fiction already in the thread, > > and more generally ably debunked the FUD that Novell somehow controls > > the Foundation. As to the rest, I have better things to do with my > > life than to debunk the rest of boycottnovell post-by-post. > > No. The boycottnovell site and the OP alluded to that there would be > moral, philosophical and or legal problems with GNOME depending on > Mono and or C#. Is that fact or is it fiction?
Ah, my apologies for misunderstanding the question. I don't have time to answer right now (class beckons) but suffice it to say that there are very diverse opinions on that question. Luis _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list