On Nov 30, 2007 3:56 PM, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If people are going to be looking at licenses, I would very > > much like to discuss the FDL v2, and our usage of the FDL in > > general. There are some troublesome parts whose implications > > for GNOME aren't clear to me. > > My immediate gut instinct on this one is 'we're stuck with it whether > we like it or not', but you know more about the copyright ownership of > the docs than I do.
Something else to look at, BTW, would be that FDL 2 will apparently be CC-SA compatible (not clear if that is 'FSF one way compatible' or 'actual two-way compatible', but wikipedia seems to think two-way compatible), and that may be something we want to look at, since that appears to be the fastest growing license commons on the non-code side of the world. Luis _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list