On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Johannes Schmid <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > AFAIK there  are quite a few standing issues with GNOME arabic
> > support.
> >
> > http://wiki.arabeyes.org/Gnome
> > http://wiki.arabeyes.org/%D8%AC%D9%86%D9%88%D9%85
> > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420964
> >
> > These are slightly out of date though.
>
> Hmm, the bugs seem mostly fixed and I don't see what this has to do with
> upstream vs. downstream.
>
> >         * Why do you think our infrastructure is limiting?
> >
> >
> > The development happening on Launchpad (not bazaar) really beats what
> > GNOME provides in several aspects, starting bug management,
> > blueprinting and linking with branches. There are a lot of nice
> > projects there that are not part of GNOME because of the GNOME
> > Infrastructure: GNOME Do, Docky, Getting Things GNOME... These
> > projects are in their own rights very successful and used by the
> > community. And by allowing them to deploy per default with GNOME would
> > just benefit the GNOME community...
> > The Project leads don't care since they are being deployed downstream
> > now which is more or less skipping the middle man which is GNOME, who
> > seem to be conservative in some of these aspects.
> > I am not saying we should switch to Lauchpad or so. But we need to
> > study and make an effort into compromising. Having major projects work
> > downstream will kill GNOME, and pointing fingers will not help.
>
> Well, I see your point while I disagree.
>
>
> >         * For the company statements IMHO despite I don't know
> >         anything about
> >         the Unity plans I think those arent' true. Could you explain?
> >
> >
> >
> > I am not saying its true but sooner or later RH will want to deploy
> > GNOME Shell on the netbooks just like Unity will at some point put an
> > eye on the desktop... Its naive to asssume both will not try to assume
> > positions in the netbook and desktop market...
>
> It's getting off-topic but would it be wrong to say that one company is
> working upstream while the other company is working downstream? Wouldn't
> the point be to have everyone work upstream? Seems like the new board
> should participate in this discussion regardless who is in the new
> board.
>

I would love to have the whole community discuss this issue... please wait
for my next mail


>
> Regards,
> Johannes
>
>
>
Cheers
Seif
_______________________________________________
foundation-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list

Reply via email to