> I've discussed it briefly with CiviCRM, and they tend to agree that it > could be improved and clarified (eg. CLA, single licence...). If this > is a major issue I'm quite sure this could be amended and made better. > > Do you mind if I quote you (anonymously) and add it to their forum, to > see what other CiviCRM think about it ?
Sounds good to me, it certainly can't hurt, right? > Again, I'd suggest not excluding CiviCRM on that criteria alone, as if > this is the only issue, they are prepare to clarify and fix the > licence situation. OK, I suppose we will see how it turns out. You're right, many people have changed licensing terms in the past. However... change might be difficult if the current codebase is not owned by a single entity? I suppose it would take the lawyers to figure that one out. -- Bob _______________________________________________ software mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.flossfoundations.org/mailman/listinfo/foundations-software
