On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Allan Eising wrote: > Ouch, that's a big show-stopper for me. > > I've heard a rumor that vlan overlap was possible with MPLS... I guess > this is not the case then. > > Thank you for your swift answers, although I'm saddened by the result, > but that's not your fault :)
Can't tell you about MLX/XMR, and I don't pretend to really understand your proposed conceptual diagram as it is outwith the sort of thing I do (campus LAN-oriented, not Service Provider-oriented), but on BigIron and probably SuperX platforms, you can do: vlan 230 name Whatever by port tagged ethe 1/1 to 1/2 ip-subnet A.B.Z.0 255.255.255.0 name SomeSubnetZ static ethe 1/1 to 1/2 router-interface ve 230 ip-subnet A.B.Y.0 255.255.255.0 name SomeSubnetY static ethe 1/1 to 1/2 router-interface ve 130 Maybe that's what you need ... Jethro. > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Tomasz Szewczyk <tom...@man.poznan.pl>wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I think it is not possible (at least at the moment). The IP can be set for > > virtual interface, but first you're creating L2 vlan and next, you need to > > add router interface. > > The configuration looks like > > s...@xmr_1(config)#vlan 2 > > s...@xmr_1(config-vlan-2)#router-interface ve 3 > > s...@xmr_1(config-vlan-2)#router-interface ve 4 > > error - vlan 2 is already has router-interface 3 > > > > So there is one ve per one vlan. VLAN is configured globally, so no > > overlapping is possible. > > It seems shaping per subinterface is not possible too: > > s...@xmr_1(config-vif-3)#qos shaper 100000 > > Error: please use physical port config interface level to configure qos > > shaper. > > But on physical interface shaping is configured globally. > > > > Probably you need to ask Foundry (Brocade currently) about extensions in > > new code versions. The output I captured comes from latest (4.0) code. > > > > Tomek > > > > Allan Eising pisze: > > > >> Hi there, > >> > >> > >> We're currently considering if the Foundry MLX/XMR series will fit as our > >> core routers. > >> I've been searching through the foundry site, and there are two core > >> requirements that I'm uncertain if the XMR or MLX can handle: > >> > >> - VLANs overlapping between interfaces, eg. two routed vlan subinterfaces > >> both encapsulated with vlan 50. > >> - Per sub-interface shaping. > >> > >> For the sake of clarity, I've uploaded a conceptual diagram, available > >> here: > >> http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/5186/conceptsl6.png > >> > >> Is there anyone on this list who are able to assist? > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Allan Eising > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> foundry-nsp mailing list > >> foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp > >> > > > > > -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jethro R Binks Computing Officer, IT Services, University Of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@puck.nether.net http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp