Hi, Den 1/27/09 12:21 PM skrev "Allan Eising" <[email protected]> følgende: > If we didn't have this provider, that terminates with QinQ encapsulation, my > solution would have been to add a PVLAN, but since I've never seen equipment > that handles QinQinQ, it's not an option.
Why should this be a problem? I haven't run this myself, but I know that our double-tagged packets are forwarded by a provider with another tagging and thus effectively is tripple-tagged. This is completely Foundry-based in both ends. Not only is it possible, but I'd also say it's the right way of doing it. Cheers, Bjørn _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
