We only need basic routing + switching, IPv4+IPv6, vrrp, some ospf, no BGP, no hidden limits on ACL +PBR (like FESX448 has 1024 acl lines limit).
________________________________ From: George B. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:11 PM To: David Cc: Chen, Qinxue; [email protected] Subject: Re: [f-nsp] FESX648 vs. NetIron CES 20204 I would say that greatly depends on the application and design of the network. What is the application? On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:13 PM, David <[email protected]> wrote: NetIron is the way to go. It's a newer platform that runs software that powers the bigger switches like MLX and XMR. More features, more memory, and smaller form-factor. David On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Chen, Qinxue <[email protected]> wrote: Does anyone have experience on NetIron CES? Is it stable enough to compare with FESX? We are trying to make a decision on which one to choose. _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
