Michael Schnell schrieb:
On 09/14/2011 11:05 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
First and for all. Backwards compat dropping is not going to happen.

It already has and supposedly can't be avoided. Take a look of what Lazarus was forced to make out of the identity of ANSIString and UTF8String seemingly forced by FPC. e.g.:

Old programs assuming local ANSI 8 bit code retrieved from LCL GUI components, compiled with the new version don't work (e.g. if doing myChar := myString[3]; )

How many bytes must a char have, when it shall allow to store any (logical) character? Unicode users have no use for an char type, instead they have to use substrings for every logical character. A Unicode BMP user could be happy with a 2-byte char, of course, at his own (low) risk.

DoDi

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to