On Jan 18, 2008 12:34 PM, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Probably not. And if at all, it wouldn't accomplish what you want to do. > > If someone would provide a patch for this, is it gonna be accepted? If > not, may I know what the reason(s)? ;)
unit_name.function (....) ... ... How would you coap with this situation if you'll have "." inside ? You can translate it into "_", yes, or you can just use underscore at the file name at the first place... Personally I do not want to see this feature in Pascal, because it will just complicate things, because there is a use for dot in the Pascal language... > > > Then use the branch/switch feature of your favourite version control > > system. That's one thing it was designed for. > > For some reasons, sometimes version control is too bloated, especially > when the project is not too big. Nevertheless, it's the easiest way to > have "manual" version control. :D > > -Bee- > > has Bee.ography at: > http://beeography.wordpress.com > Ido -- http://ik.homelinux.org/ _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
