On Friday 18 January 2008 11:44, ik wrote: > Personally I do not want to see this feature in Pascal, because it > will just complicate things, because there is a use for dot in the > Pascal language...
Think "records". If you can have "unit.identifier.record_field" ad infinitum (any record may contain another record), it's not too far fetched to extend that concept to "unit.sub_unit. ...". Vinzent. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
