Hi Sven,

>From what I've read, the NT kernel (and filesystem) support a lot of things
that Windows in general doesn't.  Presumably this is because it is
(unofficially, of course) loosely based on VMS, but Win32 was originally
designed to work with DOS, etc.

Thank you,
     Noah Silva

2012/2/28 Sven Barth <pascaldra...@googlemail.com>

> Am 28.02.2012 08:38, schrieb Noah Silva:
>
>
>>    Windows supports multiple locales and has 95% of the
>>    computer market -
>>
>>
>> Not really: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Usage_share_of_operating_**
>> systems <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems>
>>
>> Anyway, if we did everything the way Microsoft suggested, we would give
>> up real sym links and litter the filesystem with .lnk files, too.
>>
>
> Modern versions of NTFS support symlinks, too. Also there were reasons why
> Microsoft decided to use .lnk files: http://technet.microsoft.com/**
> de-de/magazine/2006.09.**windowsconfidential%28en-us%**29.aspx<http://technet.microsoft.com/de-de/magazine/2006.09.windowsconfidential%28en-us%29.aspx>
>
> Regards,
> Sven
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> fpc-pascal maillist  -  
> fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.**org<fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org>
> http://lists.freepascal.org/**mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal<http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal>
>
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Reply via email to