Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >> Who uses WSQ other than NIST? What is it's advantage? (My WSQ knowledge >> is only the bare minimum needed to work with NBIS) > > WSQ nowadays is industry standard. Not only because of it's excellent > compression, but it is also ideal for fingerprint images.
Who actually uses it then? Just because it's a standard doesn't mean it is useful or adopted. When first dealing with NBIS I hunted for existing applications that could deal with the WSQ format. I found none outside of NIST... >> Probably wouldn't object to JPEG/PNG (assuming code is clean and can be >> modularized and excluded at compile time in future) but which use cases >> are you envisioning for this? > Couldn't agree more... and yes I am. Which use cases are you envisioning? Daniel _______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
