> > WSQ nowadays is industry standard. Not only because of it's excellent > > compression, but it is also ideal for fingerprint images. > > Who actually uses it then?
The vast mayority of companies that create scanning devices include it in their SDK for a reason. > Just because it's a standard doesn't mean it is useful or adopted. In this case it means exactly that. It's very adopted. > > When first dealing with NBIS I hunted for existing applications that > could deal with the WSQ format. I found none outside of NIST... I've had previous experience with several application that use this format a lot. Several clients require this standard (appart from the usual JPEG, PNG). Dave.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fprint mailing list [email protected] http://lists.reactivated.net/mailman/listinfo/fprint
