I'd say that S and S+ are duplicates if they both behave the same. And further I'd reformat the template so that you only have one tag for numbering at that level. The reste for the numbering being in the body, heading, and other tags. It's much more elegant, and removes the problem of missing that first numbering.
Scott At 2:57 PM -0500 10/28/08, Mike Wickham wrote: > > For example, the current template uses these paragraph tag names: >> >> S >> S1 >> S+ >> >> Both S1 is for Step 1; S and S+ act as Step +. (I don't know why there >> are two tags that appear to have the same function. A mistake? Or am I >> missing something?) > >S1 probably resets the autonumbering to start over at Step 1. > >S probably continues the numbering from the previous step. > >And S+ is probably for those situations where a step has more than one >paragraph. You don't want "Step n" at the beginning of such a paragraph, so >it omits the autonumbering. > >Mike Wickham > > >_______________________________________________ > > >You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To unsubscribe send a blank email to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >or visit >http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/quills%40airmail.net > >Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit >http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info. _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Send list messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
