At 14:31 -0700 13/7/14, Scott Prentice wrote: >Ah yes .. my experience with this is through Fusion, but I'm quite sure that >the 64/32-bit question is the same for both virtualization options. > >At the time I made this switch (7 years ago), Fusion was generally considered >the better choice, and it was also the system that a couple of my clients were >using. Since then, it seems that the "preference" switches from Parallels to >Fusion as each comes out with a new release. In reality I think it's probably >a toss-up.
I guess we're going a bit off-topic here, but this evening I tried out Fusion (5). At the moment I'm interested in OS X virtual machines, using Snow Leopard Server. I hit what looks like a major snag with Fusion: in a Fusion Snow Leopard VM I get offered only one display resolution (tiny screen), as opposed to the zillions in a Parallels (9) SL VM. I will investigate this further when I get time, and see if the problem exists in a Fusion Win7 VM. It was an evaluation version of Fusion: maybe they cripple it. -- Steve _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to framers as arch...@mail-archive.com. Send list messages to email@example.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscr...@lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/archive%40mail-archive.com Send administrative questions to listad...@frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.