You can actually do this two different ways. You can either use two
different series labels:
Numbered list N:<n=1> and N:<n+1>
Alpha list A:<a=1> and A:<a+1>
Or you can use 1 series label for this.
Numbered and alpha list:
to show numbers N:<n=1>.< > and N: <n+1>.< >
to show alpha N:< ><a=1>. and N:< ><a+1>.
Either way works.
Let me know if you need additional help
----- Original Message -----
From: karyn hunt <karyn_h...@hotmail.com>
Date: Monday, July 3, 2006 8:08 pm
Subject: I want a numbered list with alphabetized substeps
To: framers at lists.FrameUsers.com
> Hi All,
> I have a procedure with some substeps. I want to keep my
> regular numbered
> list (<n=1> and <n+>) if at all possible, and then add
> alphabetized substeps
> underneath (<a=1> and <a+>).
> But every time I try this, the numbered list picks up on the
> list and it throws the numbers off. For example: If my last
> step was b (a=2), then the next number shows as 3 (even if it's
> supposed to
> be 6, or 7 or whatever) because one step after <a+>=2 is 3.
> Is there any way to make the two operate independently of one
> while still allowing the layout to utilize the entire width of the
> I think this has to do with setting up additional columns on
> the master
> page, but I've never done that before and don't know the
> implications for my
> layout (a very simple one).
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as azdunczyk at triad.rr.com.
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit
> Send administrative questions to lisa at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.