Well, assuming the text is a continuous flow, it'll write out to .rtf that way too. Because they're graphics intensive, I'd do the .rtf to get the words and then, if necessary, do a second save of the .pdf to .PNG or .JPG to get the graphics.
Art On 10/4/06, Pinkham, Jim <Jim.Pinkham at voith.com> wrote: > Thanks for this, Art, and my apologies for not being more precise. In > our case, we have multiple-page, sometimes graphic-intensive PDFs, > provided by our vendors, that we include as appendices today. The > advantage to being able to bring them purely (or relatively purely) into > Frame would primarily be for purposes such as generated tables and > internal cross-references. However, placing documents that sometimes > have 20-40 individual pages into FM, one page at a time, would not be a > process improvement. Nor would it be worthwhile if we had to > significantly compromise quality -- then we'd still be better off with > our current string of PDFs. -- Art Campbell art.campbell at gmail.com "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358