Maybe we should change it to "This page intentionally left almost
   completely blank," to be more technically accurate :)
Shmuel Wolfson

   Combs, Richard wrote:

Daniel Emory wrote:  

Certainly I don't advocate the use of MIL specs for preparing 
commercial manuals. I do know, however, that most tech 
writers who produce manuals for commercial products remain 
blissfully unaware of the problems caused by their outputs. 

A valid point. Although some of us, at least, aren't _blissful_ about
it. Resigned, maybe. Sometimes whining and grumbling. 


All I was trying to say is that tech writers in the 
non-military world should take advantage of remedial measures 
taken by the military to minimize foul-ups. 

True, when they're applicable. But don't forget the two most important
concepts in the technical communications field: 

(1) It depends. 
(2) Know your audience. 

When your audience includes HS grads and GEDs, and they may be under
stress, in a hurry, or otherwise highly distracted, and the consequences
of a communication failure may be grave -- well, that's a bit different,
I suspect, from telling UNIX system administrators how to upgrade the
boot server software for their teleconferencing bridges. 

Software engineers, in particular, are often very literal-minded and
Spockian. I've actually had an engineer point to an "Intentionally
Blank" page (in another company's manual) and say, "A page is only blank
if there's nothing on it." :-)


Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom


You are currently subscribed to Framers as [1]sbw at

Send list messages to [2]framers at

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[3]framers-unsubscribe at
or visit [4]

Send administrative questions to [5]lisa at Visit
[6] for more resources and info.


   1. mailto:sbw at
   2. mailto:framers at
   3. mailto:framers-unsubscribe at
   5. mailto:lisa at

Reply via email to