At the risk of injecting more accurate facts into this thread and disabusing Dan's low opinion of STC (why yes, I am a senior member) ....
* Becky Frasure's original assertion that the article was published in the January issue of STC Intercom is inaccurate. What was published there was an article on "or Open-Source Tools for Technical Communicators, Part II: Interoperability" (http://www.stc.org/intercom/PDFs/2007/200701_8-11.pdf) that contains a link to ... * http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/, the commercial TechWriter mailing list site owned and operated by the same people that publish this FM mailing list, which published an article in its online magazine titled "Replacing FrameMaker with OpenOffice.org Writer" (http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/replaceframewithwriter.html) * The author of that article, Bruce Byfield, describes himself: "I am a computer journalist, primarily for the Open Source Technology Group (OSTG)" so we might assume at the outset that he may be a bit biased in his reporting because he's comparing an "open" program with a commercial competitor.... He concludes: "However, so long as they take the time to learn Writer, they can be in little doubt that they are using software that competes with FrameMaker on its own terms, and wins as often it loses. Even ignoring the cost and philosophical differences, OpenOffice.org is clearly an acceptable alternative to FrameMaker." He does, however, present some interesting conclusions. Some of which I'd disagree with, but there ya go. Byfield's own site is at http://members.axion.net/~bbyfield/ Cheers, Art On 2/1/07, Daniel Emory <danemory7224 at sbcglobal.net> wrote: > The publication by the STC of this article > demonstrates the declining relevance of that > organization. > ==== > > _______________________________________________ -- Art Campbell art.campbell at gmail.com "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson No disclaimers apply. DoD 358
