In addition to verifying that the problem is the placement of the
graphic -- never in a footnote -- I think the problem is caused by the
footnote being in a separate flow than the rest of the numbering is
(because it's in a footnote).

Best solution is to display it properly, or add the numbering by hand
at your final production stage.

Art

On 2/8/07, MATT TODD <mtodd at arielcorp.com> wrote:
> Using FM 7.0, Windows.
>
> I am writing a manual with three chapters, three appendices, and several
> graphics. All of the graphics are chapter specific numbered - Chapter 1
> graphics are numbered 1-1, 1-2, etc., Appendix A graphics are numbered
> A-1, A-2, etc.
>
> One of the graphics in Chapter 2 resides in a table footnote. FM does
> not recognize the numbering of this graphic. In the chapter document, it
> numbers the graphics as if that particular graphic did not exist.
>
> However, when I generate a List of Figures for the book, FM places the
> graphic in its proper location, but without numbering. It looks like
> this:
>
> Figure 2-8 Perfectly Fine Graphic               2-10
> Troublesome Graphic                             2-11
> Figure 2-10 Another Fine Graphic                2-15
>
> Any ideas how to cure this dyspepsia?
>
> Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> You are currently subscribed to Framers as art.campbell at gmail.com.
>
> Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com.
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com
> or visit 
> http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/art.campbell%40gmail.com
>
> Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit
> http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
>


-- 
Art Campbell                                             art.campbell at 
gmail.com
  "... In my opinion, there's nothing in this world beats a '52 Vincent
               and a redheaded girl." -- Richard Thompson
                             No disclaimers apply.
                                     DoD 358

Reply via email to