Hadn't thought of the multiple instance angle...good point. My clients have opted for the Cut/Paste (yes, groan all at once) because even the fast option of saving as TIFF and importing slows down a doc with 300 or more captures. They had more difficulty managing file names than managing files referenced in multiple locations.
Along those lines, another client refuses to import native .ai files and instead uses EPS because of the .5 second delay in preview. The little things count when multipled out hundreds of times! -Matt Sullivan GRAFIX Training, Inc. An Adobe Authorized Training Center www.grafixtraining.com 888 882-2819 -----Original Message----- From: Combs, Richard [mailto:richard.co...@polycom.com] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 4:15 PM To: Matt Sullivan; Framers List Subject: RE: High quality images Matt Sullivan wrote: > For screen captures, my clients have the best success simply > pasting from SnagIt, or their application of choice. As the > files would almost never be modified in a bitmap editor, but > simply re-captured, the image on disk is a bit redundant. Importing by reference is _far_ better than pasting, IMHO. The graphics file on disk isn't "redundant" because it's the only instance that exists. The docs contain only a link to that file, not the graphic itself. Then, when the screen changes, I just replace the graphics file, and the doc is automatically updated. If the same screen shot appears in several places, I don't have to remember them all -- just replace the one file that's referenced in each place. Richard ------ Richard G. Combs Senior Technical Writer Polycom, Inc. richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom 303-223-5111 ------ rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom 303-777-0436 ------