Sorry if this is a repost -- I got an autogenerated message that this post DIED before it reached it's destination.
"I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. <framers at lists.frameusers.com>: Command died with status 1:" ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Deirdre Reagan <deirdre.rea...@gmail.com> Date: Oct 9, 2008 2:43 PM Subject: Graphics in FM To: Framer's List <framers at lists.frameusers.com> Hi all! FM 8.0, Windows XP. In my documents, we use black and white line drawings exclusively. I've been cutting and pasting 200 pixels / inch bitmaps. FM scrolls through them very quickly. My colleagues import 300 pixels / inch jpgs. Their jpgs are better quality but FM works very very slowly when scrolling past a page with a jpg. I just imported a PDF-ed graphic that was made from a 600 pixels / inch jpg. It has the best resolution and FM scrolls through the page very quickly. So here's my question: is there any downside to using the PDF-ed graphic? We PDF these documents and send them to the customer, who does who know what to them. We may in the future be turning these documents into HTML documents. I don't know jack about graphics, so any help would be most appreciated. Deirdre