As you say, different users have different needs, but that does not mean the tool is wrong in how it goes about it's work.? Frame does work the way it should, you just don't like or agree with how it defines that.
Word should too, and not reformat documents on a whim or renumber items willy-nilly, crash (and corrupt the file) in your 1200 page manual, let you update all tables in a document with a new style in one shot, . . . ? Les --- On Fri, 2/12/10, Writer <generic668 at yahoo.ca> wrote: *shrug* Different users have different needs, and FM tables don't meet mine. As to the OP's op, we shouldn't have to have a multitude of plug-ins for FM. It should work the way it should work. Nadine On 12/02/2010 5:24 AM, Yves Barbion wrote: > Tables not FM's strong point? Hmmm, I haven't heard that one before, Nadine. > I've seen a prepress company buying FM only for its powerful table features. > They had to produce travel catalogs of several hundreds of pages full of > tables and pictures and they couldn't get the job done with Quark XPress or > InDesign at the time. > > And yes, Rick's TableCleaner > <http://www.frameexpert.com/plugins/tablecleaner/>is a must-have plug-in. > > Cheers
