Geir Bækholt · Jarn wrote:

On Dec 23, 2007, at 01:31 , Martin Aspeli wrote:

The PLIP also mentions a better RSS portlet. I won't be able to do that, but rumour is that Wichert has done it in the "feedmixer" portlet already. Is that correct? If not, do we have any other volunteers?


Feedmixer is a better RSS portlet, and should cover most usecases. It aggregates multiple feeds to one (and includes a "more…" listing.) , but you can easily cover the simple usecase of a single feed as well. 
This is what I send to Martin earlier:

   Feedmixer is not a 'better' portlet (even if its implementation
   actually is better). Feedmixer serves a different purpose: a portlet
   and page that shows data aggregated from multiple feeds. That is
   quite different than what the standard RSS portlet does: that makes
   it extremely easy to add a portlet for a single feed. The use cases
   differ enough to warrant
   separate portlets.

   The main problem people have with the current RSS portlet is that it
   does not work for anonymous users, or it only works as long as there
   are authenticated users active as well. I fixed that in svn a while
   ago but that hasn't made it into a release yet.

based on that we'll keep feedmixer as a separate product.

Wichert.

--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                  It is hard to make things simple.

_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

Reply via email to