"Gonna be show & telling my Double/Regular8mm optical printer (merci Matt McWilliams for all his essential help)."
I've been blessed to see this up close and it's radder than it even sounds 🤘 On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 6:04 PM Sandy McLennan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hell yeah! See you there. Gonna be show & telling my Double/Regular8mm > optical printer (merci Matt McWilliams for all his essential help). Looking > forward to it; glad you're going. > > Sandy > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 5:57 PM Anna Kipervaser <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yeah, optical printing is a route I also use often, and hell yea making >> magic Double 8mm and Reg8mm films in the JK and tape splicing . Can't wait >> to see your new films, Sandy, and hope to see you in Toronto next month! >> >> Scott - Presstape ain't what I would use. But, then again, I'm just here >> offering to tape splice folks' negatives. Re the blur, again - depends on >> the tape being used, the person doing the splicing, and the eyes/glasses >> the person is using. Anywho, I'm not trying to start an argument about tape >> vs cement or get or give lessons. Just asking whether folks are cutting >> their own negs these days or if y'all are sending things out to get cut, >> or, as Jeff points out, if folks are doing film-outs instead. >> >> Always, >> Anna >> >> >> --- >> anna kipervaser >> annakipervaser.com >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 5:45 PM Sandy McLennan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Good on ya, mate. Perhaps not in the same boat, but I’ll be tape >>> splicing some camera-original Double8mm and Regular8; not worried about >>> seeing it when optically printing then contact printing from that. Visually >>> part of the process. >>> >>> I didn’t realize splicing towards a release print is as common a current >>> topic as it apparently is. Been decades since I did it. Difficult, yet >>> defining. Splice on! >>> >>> Sandy McLennan >>> Port Sydney, Ontario >>> >>> > On Apr 22, 2023, at 5:32 PM, Scott Dorsey <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > A-B rolling with a couple frames of overlap, you can get away with >>> tape but >>> > there's always a little blur at the splice because the tape never goes >>> over >>> > the sprockets in the printer perfectly. With a dissolve where there >>> is a >>> > couple dozen frames of overlap I can't really tell the difference. >>> > >>> > I once edited a short film with a Kodak Presstape Splicer, using a four >>> > frame overlap, and it went okay. >>> > >>> > But these days you can buy an M-H hot splicer for pennies on the >>> dollar so >>> > there isn't so much of a need anymore... >>> > --scott >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Frameworks mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > >>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org >>> >>> -- >>> Frameworks mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org >>> >> -- >> Frameworks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org >> > -- > Frameworks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org > -- -- Karl Reinsalu e.mail: [email protected]
-- Frameworks mailing list [email protected] https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
