I've ignored almost every post under this subject heading. But . . a little
about this corner of the world.
In Oklahoma we are building a media program for artists that includes artists'
approaches to traditional and digital photography, digital video, 16 mm and
Super 8 film, and new media technologies (what is sometimes called robotics).
No medium is enough for the artistic investigations of someone who is thinking
with the changes we undergo.
As I see it, the first criterion for constructive discussion is a decent
education in the history of media art, beginning with the circumstances under
which seminal work in film, video, and performance took place, the nature of
social changes experienced since then, the impact of the humanities on the arts
(growth of film studies within academia, for example), and the importance of
older media technologies (books and writing, for example, works in earlier
formats, the continuing meanings of older technologies, etc.) for the creation
and dissemination of important ideas and work today. The next criterion for
such a discussion would extend this context to include more popular media, such
as the kind of filmmaking that most film theorists write about (budgeted,
scripted, acted, what I see people like Shaviro addressing), the changing (and
remaining) economics impacting what gets made, what can be said, who can say
it, how long it resonates. Individual
creativity being a very high priority, a further criterion for constructive
discussion would be a grasp of the dynamics of competition (the search for
individual exposure under new media conditions, strategies for success as an
independent artist, and such like).
There is no way to sustain such a constructive discussion without an
educational context and orientation "on the ground" that Frameworks
presupposes, a context that will always risk becoming homogeneous in the
absence of new blood, a context that provokes will always require renewal and
transformative disruption over passification and mere reproduction.
Bernie
School of Art and Art History
University of Oklahoma
________________________________
From: Francisco Torres <[email protected]>
To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Forbes editorial about Kodak
Aaron talks about "Constructive criticism" This is not Mrs. Hendersonn 6th
grade home room, paly.
Do not come in here with a knife clenched in your teeth and expect to be
treated with silk gloves.
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
